In an article recently published by "Jeune Afrique" (here is the link   for those of you reading French), they describe how in Tunisia you can   buy pirated software in public stores.  The article then mentions  about 30 other similar shops in Tunis full of people buying pirated   software. In those stores, a software that is priced at thousands of   dollars is sold for five to ten dollars. Across the region, up to 80% of software is counterfeit. Actually the biggest piracy is  that of  music/movies CDs and DVDs sold in more than 35,000 locations  across the  country.
In this post, I'd like to focus on  the software piracy. And this post is not particularly targeted at  Tunisia as this happens in all  the countries in the region and in other  emerging markets like China.
So the good news is that  those stores are full of people,  confirming that the ICT (and digital  media) market is growing in the  region. The bad news is that those  people buy pirated content and don't pay the full price, or at  least  that is the thinking in the developed countries.
The  reaction of developed countries to this situation is to require  that  those countries put in place the laws to protect Intellectual  Property  (IP) and threatening the users buying pirated versions. In fact Tunisia recently adopted such a law but that  did not  change the situation. These stores are publicly accessible and  the law  does not seem to be applied.
So most Independent Software  Vendors  (ISVs), i.e. the companies that develop those software and sell  it for  hundreds or thousands of dollars don't see that revenue to which  they  are legally entitled.
For those ISVs that want to take the   opportunity to increase their  revenue by penetrating the growing ICT  market in Africa, there is no question that piracy get  them thinking  twice before making that investment.
Everything I said  so far is the  superficial analysis of the situation. It typically  results from  developed countries trying to apply in Africa what they do  at home  without understanding the local situation. Actually, part of  the answer is provided by a customer of one of those stores interviewed  in the article: "I  know that they are pirated, but I can not afford programs such as  AutoCAD or InDesign, they are too expensive. I would have to invest about EUR 4000 for software to be able to work. It is not within my means, but here I have it for 5 euros. Somehow,   I find it normal to choose the pirated versions, because the  publishers  are filling their pockets on the backs of consumers and,  with such  prices, they create a selection by money".
Most ISVs in developed countries do not understand how to do business "at the bottom of the pyramid". In his book "The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid",   C.K. Prahalad makes a great case on how to serve the world's poorest   people AND make a profit. "The rich use cash to inventory convenience.   They can afford, for example, to buy large bottle of shampoo to avoid   multiple trips to the store. The poor have unpredictable income streams.   Many subsist on daily wages and have to use cash conservatively. They   tend to make purchases only when they have cash and buy only what they   need for that day."
The   first thing to do to address the piracy problem is to adapt the  pricing to the region.  Clearly selling software at $4,000 is not  affordable for most people in  the region. "This requires to start with a  radically new understanding  of the price-performance relationship  compared to that currently  employed in developed markets. This is not  about lowering prices. It is  about altering the price-performance". An  example is Microsoft's Windows XP Starter Edition offered  in developing countries. It is a low-cost version of Windows, but  users can run only three programs or have three windows opened at once.   Performance and price are adapted to local need. ISVs then may fear  that those low cost products be sold in  developing countries competing  with the "same" product sold there at a  higher price. That risk is  reduced by different performance, the  Windows XP starter edition  running only three programs at once would  probably not satisfy the more  sophisticated needs of users in developed  countries.
Another  way to address the pricing problem are free open source software (OSS).  Linux is a free open source operating system, and actually,  the best  Linux version in the market is Ubuntu developed by an ISV  originating  from South Africa. The challenge for OSS is that they have very  little visibility in emerging markets. Consumers in those markets are  very influenced by recognizable brands. The reason is that they have no  access to other information about products than brand advertisement. It  is very unlikely that free OSS can spend the money to establish  their  brand and compete against the mega marketing power of Microsoft. This  will change over time when access to Internet will increase (see my  posting of August 31, 2010)
The second thing that can,  and in my opinion SHOULD be done by ISVs to counter piracy is to adapt  their software to local needs: local languages, local currency, local  culture, desired local "look-and-feel.",etc. This is called  "localization" of the software. Again  Microsoft announced the Local  Language Program, a global initiative to partner  with governments to  localize Windows in regional languages. Localized software in local  languages and sold at a lower cost in emerging market are even more  unlikely to be sold in Europe or US. But more importantly, localized software will deliver more value and be more attractive to local buyers.
But probably the  best protection against piracy is still to come and will be provided by  cloud computing. Cloud computing is a new consumption and delivery model  for IT. SMEs can buy access to IT resources from cloud providers on a  pay-by-usage basis. End-users no longer need expertise in, or control of the technology infrastructure "in the cloud."   
For  SMEs, the traditional paradigm for procuring IT was to buy their own  software and hardware. Now the SME only needs a good Internet connection  to remotely access the IT infrastructure that is located in the cloud  provider’s data center.  The cloud provider can offer access to IT  services for a lower cost than an on-premise IT infrastructure. This low  cost is achieved by the cloud provider’s ability to share IT  infrastructure among a large number of consumers, by utilizing efficient  IT service management.  
ISVs use clouds to deliver software applications through Internet.  This is known as Software as a Service (SaaS). User  then use PCs (even a cheap Netbook with an Internet browser will do it)  and mobile phones to access the SaaS of their choice. A  familiar example of SaaS is Gmail. Gmail is an email application  running in the Google cloud data center and can be accessed through the  Internet, using a simple web browser. Other examples of SaaS used by  SMEs are Salesforce.com, SugarCRM.com, and zoho.com.  
When  delivered as a SaaS, software cannot be copied and pirated anymore as  it resides in a remote secured data center and it is not available on  CDs or DVDs. In addition ISVs are guaranteed to collect the revenue  for the usage of their software by offering access to their SaaS through  monthly subscription, typically less than $10/ month/ user. This price would surely better please the customer interviewed in the article. 
ISVs may ask themselves how will I get my investment back with such a low price? First the low price will attract significantly more buyers than the high price. In the telco industry in India, handsets prices used to be in the $300-$1,000 range and not surprisingly, the market was limited. Until one telco offered 100 free minutes for a mobile, multimedia phone with an up-front payment of $10 and monthly payments of $9.25. The company received 1 million applications in 10 days!
Actually ISVs don't see a penny from the 5 dollars currently paid to the pirate shops. A monthly subscription per user of 10 dollars/month over the lifetime of the usage of the software will ultimately exceed the onetime charge of thousands of dollars in the traditional model. If the  user does not pay her subscription fees, the ISV can interrupt access  to the SaaS by removing the user name from the authorization database.
 
1 comment:
Great stuff you have here and nice post. Whatever is being written here is certainly a big help.
Store Software
Post a Comment